“She will OPEN…” → You’re rebranding a freeze response as consent. If your model can’t tell freeze from desire, it’s unsafe and useless.
“Wide doe-eyes / trembling.” → Those are classic threat cues, not invitations. If your “skill” needs fear to look like attraction, it’s not skill.
“She will CRY out, bite and scratch.” → That’s defense, not passion. Treating pushback as proof is predatory logic.
“She will BEG for more.” → Compliance under pressure ≠ consent. If a “yes” only appears after ignoring discomfort, it’s not a yes.
“The NEED is part of her soul.” → Universalizing women’s desire is gender essentialism. Desire is individual; your script erases people.
“Read it on her body… smell it on her skin.” → Mind-reading is not evidence. If you can’t be wrong, you’re not reading—you’re projecting.
“Neutral gets you NOTHING; only POLARISATION.” → False dichotomy. Confidence doesn’t require coercion. You sell aggression because you can’t teach connection.
“Masculine frame / penetrative energy.” → Vague mysticism. Swap in “vibe” and nothing changes. If it can’t be measured or falsified, it’s marketing, not method.
“Thrust that into any situation.” → So your plan relies on people too polite to confront you. That’s not magnetism; that’s social cornering.
“Do you need a signed invitation?” → Yes. It’s called enthusiastic consent. If you treat clarity as weakness, you’re announcing you can’t earn real yeses.
“They are desperate to feel alive.” → Convenient story: if she resists, you claim “fear of aliveness.” Heads you win, tails she loses—self-sealing and unfalsifiable.
Result: A script that turns ambiguity into permission, resistance into desire, and discomfort into validation. That’s not a map of attraction; it’s a permission slip to ignore women.
You don’t just jump a girl with that stuff - it’s a gentle on ramp with temperature checks and feedback loops as you go. Not like ‘Surprise, BDSM, Bitch!’
Stop branding pressure as skill. Bring explicit consent or stop bullshitting. Real doms negotiate. Pretenders improvise and call it a ‘gentle ramp.’ Pick a lane!!
Europeans don’t do the bullshit paperwork thing honey. I did actually try it at the start, and did onboard a few girls with a consent /NDA form, but it caused problems than anything else and I dropped it. It really wasn’t necessary. I can tell you have a problem so no worries it isn’t for you. But for the sake of completeness, the biggest issue I have with girls is how obsessed and jealous they get. I couldn’t get them to leave, or to give me a break. Some of them I had to throw out screaming and crying as they threw tantrums - and believe me (or don’t as I guess you already decided to) but I have video. This is just my life.
Cute. Still don’t buying any word of it. I could give a fuck, but I prefer to spend my energy where it matters — and this isn’t even on the map. End of story
Sure
lol
WOW…how intense! What more can one do to satisfy her? I guess that's up to the person who decides to provide her with the pleasure she desires.
Yes, I'd love to but first I want to beat that bell with my tongue and then open it and widen my mouth for that sweet peach... Bring it!!!!!
“She will OPEN…” → You’re rebranding a freeze response as consent. If your model can’t tell freeze from desire, it’s unsafe and useless.
“Wide doe-eyes / trembling.” → Those are classic threat cues, not invitations. If your “skill” needs fear to look like attraction, it’s not skill.
“She will CRY out, bite and scratch.” → That’s defense, not passion. Treating pushback as proof is predatory logic.
“She will BEG for more.” → Compliance under pressure ≠ consent. If a “yes” only appears after ignoring discomfort, it’s not a yes.
“The NEED is part of her soul.” → Universalizing women’s desire is gender essentialism. Desire is individual; your script erases people.
“Read it on her body… smell it on her skin.” → Mind-reading is not evidence. If you can’t be wrong, you’re not reading—you’re projecting.
“Neutral gets you NOTHING; only POLARISATION.” → False dichotomy. Confidence doesn’t require coercion. You sell aggression because you can’t teach connection.
“Masculine frame / penetrative energy.” → Vague mysticism. Swap in “vibe” and nothing changes. If it can’t be measured or falsified, it’s marketing, not method.
“Thrust that into any situation.” → So your plan relies on people too polite to confront you. That’s not magnetism; that’s social cornering.
“Do you need a signed invitation?” → Yes. It’s called enthusiastic consent. If you treat clarity as weakness, you’re announcing you can’t earn real yeses.
“They are desperate to feel alive.” → Convenient story: if she resists, you claim “fear of aliveness.” Heads you win, tails she loses—self-sealing and unfalsifiable.
Result: A script that turns ambiguity into permission, resistance into desire, and discomfort into validation. That’s not a map of attraction; it’s a permission slip to ignore women.
You don’t just jump a girl with that stuff - it’s a gentle on ramp with temperature checks and feedback loops as you go. Not like ‘Surprise, BDSM, Bitch!’
Stop branding pressure as skill. Bring explicit consent or stop bullshitting. Real doms negotiate. Pretenders improvise and call it a ‘gentle ramp.’ Pick a lane!!
Europeans don’t do the bullshit paperwork thing honey. I did actually try it at the start, and did onboard a few girls with a consent /NDA form, but it caused problems than anything else and I dropped it. It really wasn’t necessary. I can tell you have a problem so no worries it isn’t for you. But for the sake of completeness, the biggest issue I have with girls is how obsessed and jealous they get. I couldn’t get them to leave, or to give me a break. Some of them I had to throw out screaming and crying as they threw tantrums - and believe me (or don’t as I guess you already decided to) but I have video. This is just my life.
Cute. Still don’t buying any word of it. I could give a fuck, but I prefer to spend my energy where it matters — and this isn’t even on the map. End of story